DRONEZONE
Counter-UAS

What Missiles Did Ukraine's New Shershen Air Defense System Use Against Banshee Jet Drones, and Could It Counter Gerans?

Defense Express · · 5 min read

Ukraine's Shershen counter-drone system, now confirmed to have engaged Banshee jet-powered targets, signals a shift from improvised gun-and-missile pickups to purpose-built mobile air defense. The key question is missile selection: if Shershen fields a low-cost, high-speed interceptor, it could offer a scalable answer to the Geran-4/5 threat that gun systems struggle to reach and legacy MANPADS struggle to afford. For Western suppliers, this validates demand for cheap interceptors and cueing radars; for Ukraine, it is a step toward an industrialized counter-UAS layer.

Ukraine's counter-drone problem has quietly split into two distinct wars. The first is against slow, propeller-driven Shahed-136 derivatives, where gun trucks, electronic warfare, and even small-arms fire have proven adequate. The second is against jet-powered Geran-4 and Geran-5 variants, which fly faster and higher, compressing engagement windows and pushing legacy short-range air defense to its kinematic limits. The Shershen system, revealed by Defense Express to have used missiles against Banshee jet drones, matters less as a single vehicle and more as evidence that Kyiv is fielding a dedicated layer for that second war.

The mechanics of the problem are straightforward. A jet-powered one-way attack UAV traveling at several hundred kilometers per hour and at altitudes above small-caliber gun range cannot be reliably serviced by the ZU-23 and Gepard-class systems that anchor Ukraine's mobile counter-drone teams. Infrared MANPADS can reach it, but each shot costs hundreds of thousands of dollars and the seeker must acquire a small, relatively cool target against ground clutter. Radar-guided short-range missiles solve the accuracy problem but historically cost more than the drone. That cost-exchange ratio is the central constraint: intercepting a cheap jet drone with an expensive missile is a losing arithmetic unless the interceptor is cheap, the launcher is reusable, and the sensor cueing is shared across a network.

Shershen appears designed around that logic. It is a mobile platform, which implies it can be dispersed to cover approach corridors rather than fixed to cities, and its use of missiles against Banshee targets suggests a fire-control chain capable of tracking fast, low-radar-cross-section objects. The specific missile matters enormously. If it is a Western short-range product, Ukraine gains capability but remains dependent on foreign production and export approvals. If it is a Ukrainian adaptation, whether a repurposed air-to-air missile or a new surface-launched interceptor, it points to a domestic industrial pathway that can scale without waiting on allied stockpiles. Defense Express has not fully resolved that question, and the answer determines whether Shershen is a stopgap or a template.

Premium assessment

This forward assessment and the rest of the analysis belong to the Premium tier — available soon. Join the list on the Premium page and read it at launch.

From the original reporting
Ukraine's defense industry is currently focused on finding effective and reliable countermeasures against russia’s jet-powered Geran-4, Geran-5, and other new UAVs, whose speed and flight altitude