Counter-UAS
Echodyne EchoFlight vs Fortem TrueView R20
Two compact electronically scanned radars competing for the low-SWaP cueing role in US expeditionary kits. The comparison highlights how metamaterial and conventional AESA designs trade weight against instrumented range.
Specification comparison
| Specification | Echodyne EchoFlight | Fortem TrueView R20 |
|---|---|---|
| Antenna | Metamaterials ESA (MESA) | Compact AESA |
| Instrumented range | Several km class against small drones (public) | Not publicly disclosed |
| Weight | Under 10 kg class (public) | Lightweight class, mast or vehicle mount (public) |
| Power | Low-power class, battery or vehicle supply | Not publicly disclosed |
| Target class | Not publicly disclosed | Small drones including RF-silent autonomous types |
| Networking | Not publicly disclosed | Multi-radar fusion via SkyDome C2 |
Values are reproduced exactly as recorded in the DroneZone systems database. Where a figure is absent from the public record, it is marked “Not publicly disclosed” rather than estimated.